StateRepression.com
  • Home
  • Welcome
  • What is State Repression?
  • Repression Data
  • US repression - the movie?!
  • Featured data
  • Featured Reading
  • INcomplete Must-read list
  • Featured Repression Scholar
  • Repression Resources
  • (Car)Toons 'o Repression
  • Caveat Civis - Citizen Beware

Is There a New War on Protest?  Trump & the Domestic Democratic Peace by Piece, Part 3

3/5/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
States where anti-protest bills are being put forward
Recently the ACLU put out some information that suggested that political protest is under assault and implicitly they are suggesting that the current US government as well as the sentiments that they have provoked by it, have led to this.  While this is an interesting proposition and clearly newsworthy, it is somewhat ahistorical and maybe a little alarmist.  There has been a longer term war on protest and protestors in the United States that extends back several decades now and the current wave with its bizarre qualifications (i.e., participating in "violent riots" in Oregon  or hitting protestors with a car in Tennessee - who is for these?), is just a bit odd to focus on.    Indeed, the only thing that has probably changed in the anti-protest stance of US political officials is the tactic being employed.

Things kind of get started in the 1960s (as many things repressive in the US).  At that time, government responses to protest were largely aggressive and often violent.   Researchers refer to this approach as the "escalated force model" — a strategy known by five distinct characteristics:
  1. Limited concern with the First Amendment rights of protesters and police obligation to respect and protect those rights;
  2. Limited tolerance for community disruption;
  3. Limited communication between police and demonstrators;
  4. Extensive use of arrests as a method of managing demonstrators ; and,
  5. Extensive use of force in order to control demonstrators.
This model of protest policing later gives way to a more "negotiated" and peaceful style whereby those engaged in dissent need to seek permission to protest through permitting, there is a discussion of what is going to take place and what will not be allowed to take place and challengers were subject to a mode of control that was more akin to death by a thousand paper cuts than bullets.  Note that this change takes place only after the most radical claimsmakers/making had been eliminated from the scene (e.g., gone are calls for nationalization, redistribution and an end of profit).  

Now, this is not to say that the state treated challengers any more kinder and gentler.  In a paper written a few years ago, entitled "Velvet Glove, Iron Fist, Or Even Hand? Protest Policing in the United States, 1960-1990", we discover that when challenged in a substantive manner (i.e., when the claim/objective is radical, when property is damaged, when tactics are highly confrontational), the US government is more likely to respond with aggressive and violent tactics.  In this regard, there was no change in how governments policed protest.  Invoking Bob Marley, when somebody moved (in a particular way), they got hurt - the same as it ever was.

Although not tremendously well documented, I recall reading about the reduction of spaces being made available for protest on US campuses throughout the country.  Indeed, at one point, I had a class assignment to find the protest zones available for 20 American Universities over time and it turned out that all of them had the sheer number of places reduced and the locales were generally moved to places with the smallest amount of traffic.  Protest was simply being made more convenient and less threatening.  

But, this is all par for the course in a democracy.  There are many people who might be in favor of free speech, assembly and protest but there are a great many who are not in favor of these - especially, if they do not particularly care for the messages being put forward.  What is alarming however is that we know very little about the effects of such shifts on subsequent challenges.  We do not know about the short, medium and/or longer term effects of such activities.  Some were excited to see protests associated with the Occupy movement, Black Lives Matter and the global action of woman around the world to show dissatisfaction and solidarity but these activities were few and far between.  Additionally, the objectives of these movements and the effectiveness of the relevant activities were not always clear.    

While I am one to quickly identify when governments are engaging in restrictions of civil liberties and personal integrity violations, we should be cognizant of larger trends as well as other questions regarding freedom that emerge.


Relevant reads:

Kraska, Peter B., and Victor E. Kappeler. 1997. “Militarizing American Police: The Rise and Normalization of Paramilitary Units.” Social Problems 44(1): 1-18.
McCarthy, John, and Clark McPhail. 1998. “The Institutionalization of Protest in the United States.” Pp. 83-110 in The Social Movement Society, edited by David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Christian Davenport's Caveat Civis - Citizen Beware

    Given the elusive nature of state repression, it is crucial to be constantly aware of information as it becomes available.  This is not always easy to do and with the different tactics, perpetrators, locations and victims of domestic spying, torture, arrest, detention, disappearances and mass killing, it is necessary to keep one's eyes open, along with one's mind - Citizen's Beware.  The data is out there.  We just need to find it and figure out what it means.

    Archives

    February 2017
    January 2017
    May 2016
    November 2015
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Comparative Politics
    Conflict Studies
    Conflict Studies
    Covert Action
    Crowd Control
    Data
    Democratic Peace
    Domestic Spying
    Genocide
    Informants
    International Relations
    Language
    Mass Killing
    Misogynists
    Music
    Never Again
    Non-lethal Weaponry
    Northern Ireland
    Obama
    Peace Studies
    Pepper Spray
    Political Violence
    Pop Culture
    Protest Policing
    Research
    Rubber Bullets
    Social Media
    Social Science
    Social Science
    Targeted Assassination
    Technology
    Terror
    Torture
    Weapons

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos used under Creative Commons from dullhunk, rossbreadmore